|
I agree with most of your reply, Kimber, with one exception. Imust
respectfully disagree with the attempt to protect the youth of america
from the evil we perpetrate on the buffywantswillow list. I know thatthis
is a stance taken mostly for legal reasons, but I have never understood
the american desire to protect children from sex and foul language but not
violence. Oh well. It's just that by the age of twelve most children know
more foul language then their parents. And have heard cruder waqys to
refer to what is esentially a beautiful act.yes I mean sex. I hate to
sound superior, but really, trying to protect any child over 12-13 from
the idea of sex is like trying to lock the barn door after the horsesare
gone.
Anyway that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Steven |